[aerogear-dev] rfc repository

Oleh Mackiv omatskiv at redhat.com
Fri Oct 6 09:04:45 EDT 2017


Hello Leonardo,

personally I think that using GitHub issues in respective projects would be
easier. Issue comments are perfect for discussion. PRs can be nicely linked
to issues. Etc.

Best regards,
Oleg

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Leonardo Rossetti <lrossett at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I was thinking if we could create a "proposals/rfc" repository in
> Aerogear's GH organization, as the name implies, it would contain
> enhancement proposals for all Aerogear projects.
>
> My main motivation for this is to have a public and official place to
> track all enhancements/ideas.
>
> I this repository could contain:
>
>    - proposal document template
>    - track proposals status:
>       - draff
>       - approved
>       - implementation
>       - done
>
> A couple of projects use this approach: ansible
> <https://github.com/ansible/proposals>, rust
> <https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs>, python
> <https://github.com/python/peps>, and the list goes on.
>
> WDYT?
>
> --
>
> LEONARDO ROSSETTI
>
> SOFTWARE ENGINEER
>
> Red Hat SP <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> lrossett at redhat.com    M: 11997030621
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Oleg Matskiv
Associate Quality Engineer
Red Hat Mobile Application Platform
omatskiv at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20171006/1a9fc9aa/attachment.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list