>I have some experience supporting both, so we can look at it later for<br>>sure, but IMO not a priority now<br>Cool, sounds good to me!<div><br></div><div>Thanks<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 27 September 2012 18:28, Douglas Campos <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:qmx@qmx.me" target="_blank">qmx@qmx.me</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I'd say no, let's keep it 6 for now<br>
<br>
reason: only early adopters got jdk7, and there are bugs still.<br>
<br>
I have some experience supporting both, so we can look at it later for<br>
sure, but IMO not a priority now<br>
<br>
-- qmx (mobile)<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
On 27/09/2012, at 13:21, Daniel Bevenius <<a href="mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com">daniel.bevenius@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi All,<br>
><br>
> I just wanted to ask if there is anything stopping us from using Java 1.7 instead of 1.6 in aerogear-controller?<br>
><br>
> There are a few things that might be nice to use, the main one I was thinking about was using method handles instead of reflection.<br>
><br>
> cheers,<br>
><br>
> /Daniel<br>
</div></div>> _______________________________________________<br>
> aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>