<div dir="ltr">><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">I'm not sure if we really need branches, maybe just tags?</span><div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">Not sure how that would work but I'd be interested to learn. I could not determine just by looking at the torguebox repo as then have branches for what looks like maintenance/dev releases (and also tags of course) </span></div>
<div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">As long as we all do the same I'm happy. </span></div><div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></span></div><div style>
<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"> </span><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 22 March 2013 10:23, Bruno Oliveira <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bruno@abstractj.org" target="_blank">bruno@abstractj.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I'm not sure if we really need branches, maybe just tags? <a href="https://github.com/torquebox/torquebox" target="_blank">https://github.com/torquebox/torquebox</a> for example has been working with tags, branches at least to me might lead to confusion.<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato<br>
-<br>
@abstractj<br>
-<br>
Volenti Nihil Difficile<br>
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
<br>
On Friday, March 22, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Sebastien Blanc wrote:<br>
<br>
> +1 to create a 1.0.0 branch<br>
> For 1.0.1 not sure if it has to be also branch or just the master otherwise Master should be for 1.1 stuff ?<br>
> Seb<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</div><div class="im">> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Daniel Bevenius <<a href="mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com">daniel.bevenius@gmail.com</a> (mailto:<a href="mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com">daniel.bevenius@gmail.com</a>)> wrote:<br>
> > Hi all,<br>
> ><br>
> > I'd like to discuss how to handle maintenance branches. Sorry if this has already been discussed, I think Kris posted something about this but I was not able to find it.<br>
> ><br>
> > For example, now that we are about to release 1.0.0 we will tag that release. After that should we create a 1.0.1 branch for patches/bugfixes and then continue with new features in master?<br>
> ><br>
> > Since we are in a waiting state at the moment, which could happen again, should we perhaps create a branch named 1.0.0, which we can use until the release and then tag it and remove that branch. After that any issues would be fixed in the 1.0.1 branch.<br>
> ><br>
> > Does this sound correct?<br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks,<br>
> ><br>
> > /Dan<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > _______________________________________________<br>
> > aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
</div>> > <a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a> (mailto:<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>)<br>
> > <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a> (mailto:<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>)<br>
> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>