<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On May 16, 2013, at 7:33 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <<a href="mailto:matzew@apache.org">matzew@apache.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Douglas Campos <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:qmx@qmx.me" target="_blank">qmx@qmx.me</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 04:30:54PM -0500, Kris Borchers wrote:<br>
> > ## 1.1.0 (Late June)<br>
...<br>
<div class="im">> > ### New Adapters<br>
> > * **Pipeline**<br>
> > * OData Adapter - [<a href="http://www.odata.org/](http://www.odata.org/)" target="_blank">http://www.odata.org/](http://www.odata.org/)</a><br>
> > * Investigate continued support / viability (Netflix dropping?)<br>
</div>mixed feelings about this one - both time-wise and viability wise.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style="">same here - really needed ?</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>I am leaning toward removing this. Luke and Sebastien, did either of you get a chance to look into this more? Maybe we put it on the back burner and we can add it back to the roadmap further down the road if we decide it is still something worth pursuing?</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div style=""><br></div><div style=""><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
> > ## 1.2.0 (Late August)<br>
On the main roadmap we're releasing the umbrella project on Late august,<br>
so ideally this would need to come Mid-August so that we can have a<br>
decent freeze window<br>
<br>
> > ## 1.4.0 (Late January)<br>
This timing seems a little bit off from the main roadmap - and the scope<br>
is pretty big - wouldn't it be a good idea to try harder to split data<br>
sync and offline? (I know this is hard)<br>
<div class="im">> > ### New Features<br>
> > * **Data Sync**<br>
> > * Utility for keeping data in DataManager synchronized with a persistent server side store<br>
> > * Possibly use Notifier for communication / data transfer<br>
> > * **Offline**<br>
> > * Support for using apps offline and detecting status<br>
> > * Simplified App Cache API<br>
> > * Scaffolding for proper App Cache setup<br>
</div>do this exists in real life? ;)<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> > * Use DataSync when returning to online status<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
qmx<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Matthias Wessendorf <br><br>blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>
sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a>
</div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>aerogear-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</blockquote></div><br></body></html>