<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">In our team meeting today, I brought up the question of whether or not the JavaScript clients for both SimplePush and Unified Push should live in folders under AeroGear.js or in their own repos. I would like to open this up to suggestions from the team. Please vote below.<div><br></div><div>SimplePush</div><div>Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at <a href="https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/simple-push">https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/simple-push</a></div><div>IMO, this makes sense since it also has a hard dependency on Notifier which lives here <a href="https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/notifier">https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/notifier</a></div><div>I would vote this remain where it is. Please vote whether or not this should remain in the AeroGear.js repo.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Unified Push</div><div>Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at <a href="https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/unified-push">https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/unified-push</a></div><div>IMO, this is not necessary since it could be used independently from the rest of AeroGear. I would vote that this move to a separate repo. This would also mean that the client object's name would change since it is currently namespaced under AeroGear as AeroGear.UnifiedPushClient. I would suggest it be renamed to AGUnifiedPushClient and be added to a repo named aerogear/unified-push-js. Please vote for whether or not this should move and if it should, an object name and repo name.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div></body></html>