<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:14 PM, Kris Borchers <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kris@redhat.com" target="_blank">kris@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">In our team meeting today, I brought up the question of whether or not the JavaScript clients for both SimplePush and Unified Push should live in folders under AeroGear.js or in their own repos. I would like to open this up to suggestions from the team. Please vote below.<div>
<br></div><div>SimplePush</div><div>Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at <a href="https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/simple-push" target="_blank">https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/simple-push</a></div>
<div>IMO, this makes sense since it also has a hard dependency on Notifier which lives here <a href="https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/notifier" target="_blank">https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/notifier</a></div>
<div>I would vote this remain where it is. Please vote whether or not this should remain in the AeroGear.js repo.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div style>I *think* it would be good to have a separated repo for it.</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>So, folks that want to use the SimplePush, and only SimplePush, could just add the "AG-SimplePush.js" to their project</div><div style>(it could still have a dependency against Notifier, right?)</div>
<div style><br></div><div style><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>
Unified Push</div><div>Currently, this lives under AeroGear.js at <a href="https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/unified-push" target="_blank">https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-js/tree/Notifier/src/unified-push</a></div>
<div>IMO, this is not necessary since it could be used independently from the rest of AeroGear. I would vote that this move to a separate repo. This would also mean that the client object's name would change since it is currently namespaced under AeroGear as AeroGear.UnifiedPushClient. I would suggest it be renamed to AGUnifiedPushClient and be added to a repo named aerogear/unified-push-js. Please vote for whether or not this should move and if it should, an object name and repo name.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div style>+1 for moving to its own repo</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Matthias Wessendorf <br>
<br>blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>
twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a>
</div></div>