<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno Oliveira <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bruno@abstractj.org" target="_blank">bruno@abstractj.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Only for Android as Summers already mentioned.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>yeah - I ment for JDK7 on all other things, besides Android :)</div>
<div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br>
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:<br>
> Honestly, I don't see a huge issue with JDK 7....<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Karel Piwko <<a href="mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com">kpiwko@redhat.com</a><br>
</div><div class="im">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com">kpiwko@redhat.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Good to know. I haven't seen any enforcer plugin rule and compiler<br>
> plugin is set<br>
> to 1.6, so I though it is still on JDK6.<br>
><br>
> Karel<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, 29 May 2013 15:27:48 +0200<br>
> Daniel Bevenius <<a href="mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com">daniel.bevenius@gmail.com</a><br>
</div><div class="im">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com">daniel.bevenius@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > Hi,<br>
> ><br>
> > SimplePush Server uses Netty 4 and now also vert.x<br>
> (2.0.0-beta4-SNAPSHOT)<br>
> > which both require Java 7. So it's not only PushEE anymore that<br>
> has this<br>
> > requirement.<br>
> ><br>
> > cheers,<br>
> ><br>
> > /Dan<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On 29 May 2013 15:11, Karel Piwko <<a href="mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com">kpiwko@redhat.com</a><br>
</div><div><div class="h5">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:kpiwko@redhat.com">kpiwko@redhat.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> > > Hi,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Most of the code is JDK6, except PushEE which requires JDK 6.<br>
> Android<br>
> > > requires<br>
> > > JDK 6 API as well, thanks Summers for pointing that out. The<br>
> only component<br>
> > > that requires JDK7 is PushEE afaict.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > So, even if JDK 6 is officially EOLed (at least Oracle's one),<br>
> I'd prefer<br>
> > > to<br>
> > > limit our code to JDK6 features. Does it make sense?<br>
> > ><br>
> > > I can setup animal sniffer plugin to enforce JDK API<br>
> conformance and<br>
> > > send PRs if you will - btw, do you guys already have a common<br>
> parent with<br>
> > > plugin<br>
> > > configuration?<br>
> > ><br>
> > > The other question is default runtime. Would you guys recommend<br>
> JDK7 or<br>
> > > JDK6?<br>
> > > I'm biased here to decide myself.<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Thanks,<br>
> > ><br>
> > > Karel<br>
> > ><br>
> > ><br>
> > > _______________________________________________<br>
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
</div></div>> > > <a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>><br>
<div class="im">> > > <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
> > ><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
</div>> <a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Matthias Wessendorf<br>
><br>
> blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>
> sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>
> twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Matthias Wessendorf <br><br>blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>
sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a>
</div></div>