<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Jul 15, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Sebastien Blanc <<a href="mailto:scm.blanc@gmail.com">scm.blanc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Lucas Holmquist <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com" target="_blank">lholmqui@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">here's a scenario.<br>
<br>
A user creates an "Application" then adds a new "iOS Variant" to it.<br>
<br>
they decide they need to rename this Variant since they didn't name it very well.<br>
<br>
There is currently no way of renaming/ updating the description of this variant without re-sending the Certificate/pass phrase. this would be the same for Android and Simple Push, just substitute google key and channels<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div style="">Is this really a problem ? Since before an update I assume you do a GET which will contain the Certificate/pass phrase, and then just doing an update passing the whole object again ... I might be missing sometyhing obvious here. </div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>i have all the info, was hoping to avoid having to resend the certificate/other stuff again.</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; position: static; z-index: auto; ">
<br>
Also, once we have a variant created, we have a variant ID, we should be able to use that ID( plus type? ) to do updates instead of having to pass the applicaitonID and variantID( same would go for a delete i guess ).<br>
<br>
<br>
Not really sure the best way to handle this.<br>
<br>
Should a user be able to update a certificate/key/channel once it has been created. How would this affect any installations it might have?</blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; position: static; z-index: auto; ">
<br>
thoughts?<br>
<br>
-Luke<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>aerogear-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</blockquote></div><br></body></html>