<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Jul 15, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Hylke Bons <<a href="mailto:hbons@redhat.com">hbons@redhat.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Lucas Holmquist <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com" target="_blank">lholmqui@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:CAD_dpu2H_JynpsfbOtfz7BUw1WK6ujg5r-kC9yxKpsoAHFz8dQ@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div>
<div class="im">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">here's a
scenario.<br>
<br>
A user creates an "Application" then adds
a new "iOS Variant" to it.<br>
<br>
they decide they need to rename this
Variant since they didn't name it very
well.<br>
<br>
There is currently no way of renaming/
updating the description of this variant
without re-sending the Certificate/pass
phrase. this would be the same for
Android and Simple Push, just substitute
google key and channels<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Is this really a problem ? Since before
an update I assume you do a GET which will
contain the Certificate/pass phrase, and
then just doing an update passing the
whole object again ... I might be missing
sometyhing obvious here. </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div>i have all the info, was hoping to avoid having
to resend the certificate/other stuff again.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="">Ok I see, with the current model that is not
really possible (saying trivially) . We could extract all
this info (cert/pass whatever) into a different
model/class and just having a 1-1 relation making the
update on the variant more simple. But I would like to
have Matzew feedback on this.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I think the same goes for renaming the Application construct?<br>
Though it just contains an extra "description" field, so it may not
be worth it…</div></blockquote><div>Update the "Application" could stay the same since all you can do is update the name and description anyway</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
Would like to hear Matthew ideas on this as well from an API design
point of view. :)<br>
<br>
Hylke<br>
<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>aerogear-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</blockquote></div><br></body></html>