<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Daniel Passos <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:daniel@passos.me" target="_blank">daniel@passos.me</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">We don't isolate it in a separate project, push is part of the library<br>
android. wdyt about it?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>what ever works for you guys, is fine for me as well.</div><div><br></div><div>I have no personal preference</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im HOEnZb"><br>
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Corinne Krych <<a href="mailto:corinnekrych@gmail.com">corinnekrych@gmail.com</a><br>
</div><div class="im HOEnZb">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:corinnekrych@gmail.com">corinnekrych@gmail.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Are we going to do the same for Android//JS then?<br>
><br>
><br>
> The JS builds are able to ship "isolated".<br>
><br>
> On Android, we can stick to the current model, IMO<br>
><br>
> -M<br>
><br>
><br>
> ++<br>
> Corinne<br>
><br>
> On Jul 23, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <<a href="mailto:matzew@apache.org">matzew@apache.org</a><br>
</div><div class="im HOEnZb">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:matzew@apache.org">matzew@apache.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Alright, as mentioned yesterday in the team meeting:<br>
>><br>
>> the push sdk will be modular, like the OTP-iOS<br>
>><br>
>> So, nothing here changes.<br>
>><br>
>> btw. Later this week we will see a version going to CocoaPods<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf<br>
</div><div class="im HOEnZb">>> <<a href="mailto:matzew@apache.org">matzew@apache.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:matzew@apache.org">matzew@apache.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> I also agree on keeping it, as it is<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Bruno Oliveira<br>
</div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">>> <<a href="mailto:bruno@abstractj.org">bruno@abstractj.org</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:bruno@abstractj.org">bruno@abstractj.org</a>>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> +1 brodular<br>
>><br>
>> Douglas Campos wrote:<br>
>> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:03:06AM +0200, Matthias<br>
>> Wessendorf wrote:<br>
>> >> [ ] Include the Push bits in the AeroGear-iOS lib<br>
>> >> [ ] Keep the Push SDK separated<br>
>> > +1 - the more modular the merrier :)<br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> abstractj<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Matthias Wessendorf <br><br>blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>
sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a>
</div></div>