<div dir="ltr">Games do not make good show cases for APIs or infrastructures (unless they are graphics, game control, etc APIs ), too many people get lost on the game details and they hardly remember, the point of the game.<div>
--</div><div>Gorkem<br><div><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Summers Pittman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:supittma@redhat.com" target="_blank">supittma@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div><div class="h5">
<div>On 09/17/2013 11:21 PM, Douglas Campos
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>While I think the idea is neat, we discussed on doing a game as the
showcase app before, and it was kinda ruled out, since it would easily
validate pareto's rule against us (80% of the work on game assets/logic,
20% on actual showcase code).
</pre>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>
Checkers would be much much easier than candy crush to show off.
Pluss there are already a ton of FOSS assets.<br>
<br>
Otherwise I agreee with your concerns.<div class="im"><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>