<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Douglas Campos <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:qmx@qmx.me" target="_blank">qmx@qmx.me</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im">On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Corinne Krych wrote:<br>
> Doug,<br>
><br>
> Thanks for your reply.<br>
> I think one the goal of AeroGear is to provide an unified API across<br>
> different platforms even if it brings some challenges…<br>
> I'm convinced we can come up with a similar API for encryption.<br>
<br>
</div>That's exactly what I'm talking about, the APIs are similar, but they<br>
should respect the languages' idiomatisms:<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
// JS code<br>
x.encrypt({a:'', b:''});<br>
<br>
// Java code<br>
x.encrypt(a, b);<br>
<br>
Why should I impose Java style over JS?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
qmx</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Matthias Wessendorf <br>
<br>blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>
twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a>
</div></div>