<div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I noticed the Java Client has an odd group/artifactId:</div><div><br></div><div><pre style="font-family:Consolas,'Liberation Mono',Courier,monospace;font-size:13px;margin-top:15px;margin-bottom:15px;background-color:rgb(248,248,248);border:1px solid rgb(221,221,221);line-height:19px;overflow:auto;padding:6px 10px;border-top-left-radius:3px;border-top-right-radius:3px;border-bottom-right-radius:3px;border-bottom-left-radius:3px;color:rgb(51,51,51)">
<code style="font-family:Consolas,'Liberation Mono',Courier,monospace;font-size:12px;margin:0px;padding:0px;border:none;background-color:transparent;border-top-left-radius:3px;border-top-right-radius:3px;border-bottom-right-radius:3px;border-bottom-left-radius:3px;word-wrap:normal"><groupId>org.jboss.aerogear.unifiedpush</groupId>
<artifactId>unified-push-java-client</artifactId></code></pre><div><br></div><div>While the other libraries use "<span style="background-color:rgb(242,242,242);color:rgb(87,86,83);font-family:monospace,serif;font-size:0.7em">org.jboss.aerogear</span>" as groupId, and something like "aerogear-xyz" as their artifactId;</div>
<div><br></div><div>The groupId change is not hard, I'd vote to also change it to "org.jboss.aerogear".</div><div><br></div><div>Regarding the artifactId, I think that "aerogear-unifiedpush-java-client" is pretty much a mouthful, so I think I'd prefer "unifiedpush-java-client"</div>
<div><br></div><div>Any thoughts ?</div><div><br></div><div>-Matthias</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>-- <br>Matthias Wessendorf <br><br>blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>
sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a>
</div></div>