<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Bruno Oliveira <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bruno@abstractj.org" target="_blank">bruno@abstractj.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Because you allowed the developer to do it. When we talk about insert<br>
multiple roles into the interceptor we are not talking about UPS only,<br>
but something more broader which might affect other projects.<br>
<br>
Keep in mind that I'm not against it, but we must think carefully before<br>
we change the rules.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>But that is already something that we can do with AG PL , adding multiple roles to the secure annotation. You said we should maybe remove this from ag-pl ? </div>
<div style> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
Sebastien Blanc wrote:<br>
> Sorry I don't get your example, why should destroyEverything() also<br>
> have "simple" annotated?<br>
<br>
</div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
abstractj<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>