<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Summers Pittman <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:supittma@redhat.com" target="_blank">supittma@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div class="im">
    <div>On 01/28/2014 11:46 AM, Matthias
      Wessendorf wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr"><br>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:48 PM,
            Lucas Holmquist <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com" target="_blank">lholmqui@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div><br>
                On Jan 28, 2014, at 10:30 AM, Summers Pittman &lt;<a href="mailto:supittma@redhat.com" target="_blank">supittma@redhat.com</a>&gt;
                wrote:<br>
                <br>
                &gt; On 01/28/2014 09:36 AM, Lucas Holmquist wrote:<br>
                &gt;&gt; yup, this is another Data Sync thread,<br>
                &gt;&gt;<br>
                &gt;&gt;&gt; From a client side perspective, i have
                concerns that there is still not a clear direction yet.<br>
                &gt;&gt;<br>
                &gt;&gt; I know there are multiple ideas floating around
                on what our model should be,  i&#39;m all for choice, but
                what about deciding on 1 model to get started with.
                 Then later once we have this nailed down,  we can have
                other &quot;adapters&quot; with different models perhaps<br>
                &gt; All the data model is is an envelope of sync
                metadata around an object<br>
                &gt; right?<br>
                <br>
              </div>
              right<br>
              <div><br>
                &gt;<br>
                &gt; We also need to think about the API and
                server/client protocol as well.<br>
                &gt;<br>
                &gt; I think that for sync 1.0 we could focus on the
                following behavior (it<br>
                &gt; worked for my demos at least)<br>
                &gt;<br>
                &gt; 1.  We have a Sync factory similar to Pipeline,
                Authenticator,<br>
                &gt; Registrar, and KeyService.<br>
                &gt; 2.  The Sync factory consumes/manages Synchronizer
                instances.<br>
                &gt; 3.  AG Synchronizer listens for sync messages using
                UnifiedPush endpoints.<br>
              </div>
              i thought for a 1.0 we weren&#39;t thinking about &quot;realtime&quot;<br>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>that is my impression as well, talking to Dan on IRC;</div>
            <div>ATM all is polling, but the sync-server will be cable
              of doing WebSocket/SockJS, so &quot;connected&quot; clients, can
              sync.</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote></div>
    Polling is MURDER on battery, performance, and &quot;feel&quot;.  WebSockets
    and SockJS are awesome ideas for a future implementation for &quot;real
    time&quot;.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>As far as I understood it, the sync-server just started w/ polling (pure HTTP). I think that WebSocket/SockJS is not really that far away, in terms of &#39;future&#39;</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div class="im"><br>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Push should be really used for &#39;wake-up&#39;, instead of
              changing real information; Also SimplePush clients could
              not even integrate here (the protocol just uses version
              (or timestamps)</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote></div>
    Yes.<br>
    <br>
    On the topic of Simple Push, you push a URL so in theory you could
    push /Documents/${collecitonName}/${id}/${rev_id} and have simple
    push setup to accept URLS formatted that way right?  Or is it more
    limited than that?</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>you can simply ONLY push a version number, that&#39;s it</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div><div class="h5"><br>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div> </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div>
                <div><br>
                  &gt; 4.  AG Synchronizer sends sync messages using
                  Pipes<br>
                  &gt; 5.  AG Synchronizer holds local data in a store<br>
                  &gt;<br>
                  &gt; 6.  When AGSynchronizer gets a message it is
                  responsible for updating<br>
                  &gt; the Store and then notifying code listing for
                  updates OR for notifying<br>
                  &gt; the code that an error has occurred and needs to
                  be addressed.<br>
                  &gt;<br>
                  &gt; 7.  When the developer updates data in the store,
                  the synchronizer<br>
                  &gt; should package that data and send it to the
                  server.  The synchronizer is<br>
                  &gt; responsible for error handling, retrying,
                  back-off, etc.<br>
                  &gt;<br>
                  &gt; 8.  We should include multiple synchronizer
                  implementations to deal with<br>
                  &gt; multiple very simple use cases which involve
                  legacy systems. (For<br>
                  &gt; instance polling to load static data on a
                  schedule.)<br>
                  &gt;<br>
                  &gt; Thoughts? Tomatoes?<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt;<br>
                  &gt;&gt;
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  &gt;&gt; aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
                  &gt;&gt; <a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
                  &gt;&gt; <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
                  &gt;<br>
                  &gt; _______________________________________________<br>
                  &gt; aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
                  &gt; <a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
                  &gt; <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
                  <a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
                  <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
          <br clear="all">
          <div><br>
          </div>
          -- <br>
          Matthias Wessendorf <br>
          <br>
          blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>
          sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>
          twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
aerogear-dev mailing list
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div></div></div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Matthias Wessendorf <br>
<br>blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>
twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a>
</div></div>