<br><br>On Thursday, April 17, 2014, Lucas Holmquist <<a href="mailto:lholmqui@redhat.com">lholmqui@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
On Apr 17, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Bruno Oliveira <<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'bruno@abstractj.org')">bruno@abstractj.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> So maybe "master secret" and "secret" are a bad naming, once it's not<br>
> secret? And the correct would be "API key"<br>
<br>
+1 to API key, i believe that is what google might use</blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>+1</div><div><br></div><div>variantKey (instead if secret)</div><div>AppKey (instead of masterSecret)</div><div><br></div>
<div><br></div><div>Sorry for the bad initial <span></span>naming :-(</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
><br>
> Sebastien Blanc wrote:<br>
>> I compare these secrets with the API keys that Google provides for its<br>
>> services. When you go on their Cloud Console , you can check your API key<br>
>> along with the project number.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> abstractj<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org')">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org')">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
</blockquote><br><br>-- <br>Sent from Gmail Mobile<br>