<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>overall I am not against changes for 1.1.x, on our master branch. Here is something that Sebi mentioned a few month ago: <a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-534">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-534</a></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>right I like this as well, but here the users data is also mixed with the message, that was the point.</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">
<div><br></div><div>With some API change, coming up, let's not forget about "REST API Versioning", he discussed at our Face2Face meeting: <a href="http://oksoclap.com/p/jbrS1EHWkI">http://oksoclap.com/p/jbrS1EHWkI</a></div>
<div>(looks like in that session the majority preferred headers over URI).<br></div><div><br></div><div>We have to support the 1.0.0 APIs for quite a while.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>Sure, but because we have a version can’t mean that we cannot change things I hope. We just need to have a good mechanism inlace to maintain these versions. <br><br></div><br></body></html>