<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2014-08-28 8:50 GMT+03:00 Matthias Wessendorf <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matzew@apache.org" target="_blank">matzew@apache.org</a>></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>On our Face2Face meeting we briefly talked about this and I think the "accept header" solution was the one that had most fans. I think QMX added that it is better for migration. One thing we were not clear on (I think): What are HATEOS defined semantics?</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>What exactly do you mean by "HATEOAS defined semantics"; Is it in the roadmap to use a HATEOAS implementation (maybe Hal) or Json hyper schema in UPS rest?</div><div><br></div>
<div>Thanks,</div><div>Tolis </div></div><br></div></div>