<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Daniel Bevenius <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:daniel.bevenius@gmail.com" target="_blank">daniel.bevenius@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span class=""><span style="font-size:13px">> Also, maintaining the roadmaps is tedious: You make a change on the actual JIRA (e.g. move the date of a release or add a new feature). To keep the roadmap up-to-date, you put the same info on the roadmap doc and send a PR</span><br></span><div><span style="font-size:13px">I agree. The only concern for me would be that it might not be as clear for users coming to our site that are not used to JIRA. </span></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>the versions page is pretty easy to read :) Version # and a date. + a link to dive into details </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div class="h5">On 15 December 2014 at 14:09, Matthias Wessendorf <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matzew@apache.org" target="_blank">matzew@apache.org</a>></span> wrote:<br></div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div><div class="h5"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi team,<br></div><div><br></div><div>while thinking about restructuring our roadmaps, I was wondering about our existing roadmaps on [1]. Overall I'd like to have the AG roadmaps more feature driven, but that requires some more thoughts/changes?</div><div><br></div><div>However, here is what I am wondering about...</div><div><br></div><div>Most of our roadmaps we link to from [1], are really just pointing to different JIRAs.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Let's take one example, UPS:</div><div><a href="https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/UnifiedPush/" target="_blank">https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/UnifiedPush/</a></div><div><br></div><div>Basically all info on the above page is present in JIRA (including the 'archived' roadmap of older releases). Since JIRA should be the central tool for planing releases, features and future versions, I think that our roadmap docs are not adding too much value, since they repeat info that is available on a different place (JIRA).</div><div><br></div><div>Also, maintaining the roadmaps is tedious: You make a change on the actual JIRA (e.g. move the date of a release or add a new feature). To keep the roadmap up-to-date, you put the same info on the roadmap doc and send a PR.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Can we remove these roadmap docs?</div><div><br></div><div>For UPS that would mean, that the link on [1] would go against:</div><div><a href="https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:versions-panel" target="_blank">https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:versions-panel</a></div><div><br></div><div>instead of here:</div><div><a href="https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/UnifiedPush/" target="_blank">https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/roadmaps/UnifiedPush/</a></div><div><br></div><div>-Matthias</div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/" target="_blank">https://aerogear.org/docs/planning/</a></div><span><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div>Matthias Wessendorf <br><br>blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a></div>
</font></span></div>
<br></div></div><span class="">_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org" target="_blank">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Matthias Wessendorf <br><br>blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a></div>
</div></div>