Yeah, submodules suck! :-)<div><br></div><div>Tomorrow I will also file me a JIRA to move AeroDoc in here, instead of its own repo. <span></span><br><div><div><br>On Tuesday, February 3, 2015, Bruno Oliveira <<a href="mailto:bruno@abstractj.org">bruno@abstractj.org</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Good morning, I'm struggling to understand why we have submodules here:<br>
<a href="https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-backend-cookbook" target="_blank">https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-backend-cookbook</a>. Do we have a good<br>
reason for it?<br>
<br>
To give you some context, I already tagged the cookbook backend as 0.0.1<br>
("stable") and would like to generate the binaries from this tag.<br>
<br>
To be it doesn't make any sense on having submodules there and we have 2<br>
alternatives:<br>
<br>
1. Move the repositories to the aerogear-backend-cookbook<br>
2. Remove the submodules<br>
<br>
Thoughts?<br>
<br>
--<br>
<br>
abstractj<br>
PGP: 0x84DC9914<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, 'cvml', 'aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org')">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div><br><br>-- <br>Sent from Gmail Mobile<br>