<div dir="ltr">For our work, required for supporting APNs' HTTP/2 APIs we also need JDK-8.<div><br></div><div>I wonder if we should call the release 2.0.0, and really aim only WF10/EAP7 + (Open)JDK-8</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Lukáš Fryč <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lukas@fryc.eu" target="_blank">lukas@fryc.eu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi guys,<div><br></div><div>we are working on delivering some improvements in UPS messaging subsystem in 1.2.0,</div><div><br></div><div>and part of that is also adoption of WF10 (with ActiveMQ Artemis underneath).</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>The problem is that WF10 is JDK8 only, so if we use it for tests, we are limiting ourselves to JDK8-only build. We could run it on WF8 with JDK7, off course.</div><div><br></div><div>Question is, do we want to support WF8 with UPS 1.2.0+, or should we switch to WF10 only?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>~ Lukas</div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
aerogear-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org">aerogear-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Matthias Wessendorf <br><br>blog: <a href="http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/</a><br>sessions: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf</a><br>twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/mwessendorf" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/mwessendorf</a></div>
</div>