[Aerogear-users] [aerogear-dev] UPS Device Registration Endpoints

[Luke Holmquist]

Thanks for the info guys.

Also i just released the 0.1.0 version of this
https://www.npmjs.com/package/unifiedpush-registration-client

a client for doing device registration.

Currently implemented is register and unregister.  i'm working on getting
the "importer" working for the next release.



On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Envoyé de mon iPhone
>>
>> Le 27 mai 2016 à 21:56, Luke Holmquist <lholmqui at redhat.com> a écrit :
>>
>> thats right folks, i'm asking this question on a Friday before a Holiday
>> weekend(US) at 3:52(est)
>>
>>
>> i've started to implement the Device registration endpoints in node and
>> was just wondering what the id is here in this header
>>
>>
>> -v -H "Accept: application/json" -H "Content-type: application/json" -H "aerogear-push-id: someid"
>>
>>
>> is it something specific, or just a random number/alpha-numeric thingy
>>
>>
>> here is the doc link for reference:
>> https://aerogear.org/docs/specs/aerogear-unifiedpush-rest/#246535932
>>
>> Let's wait for Matzew to confirm but I think you can ignore it. Looks
>> like a left over from our first analytics implementation , we use now a
>> separate endpoint (the PUT) and pass this ID as a path parameter.
>> We probably need to clean up the javadoc
>>
>
> correct, doc error.
>
> the thing is only relevant here:
>
> https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/252c3a979cf05b69f061f7ffa6d3dcc8826c7b51/jaxrs/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/rest/registry/installations/InstallationRegistrationEndpoint.java#L203
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> I've also decided to create this as a separate module instead of
>> including it in the node admin client here:
>> https://github.com/bucharest-gold/unifiedpush-admin-client
>> mostly becuase these registration endpoints don't needed to be KC
>> authenticated.
>>
>> even if they were KC managed, they would be different (E.g. just
> bearer-only), since there is no relationship to the actual mgmt of the
> server.
>
> +1 on separating these two things
>
> -M
>
>
>
>>   and they could also be used on a IOT device or something that runs node
>> that has webpush/simplePush or some new crazy protocol.
>>
>> Make sense , I like that
>>
>>
>>
>> -Luke
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Aerogear-users mailing list
>> Aerogear-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-users/attachments/20160531/d925fa64/attachment-0001.html