[Apiman-user] Integration with separate Keycloak server?

Eric Wittmann eric.wittmann at redhat.com
Mon Jan 4 08:46:43 EST 2016


Just to add something to this part of the conversation - we will 
certainly be updating our Keycloak support soon.  Certainly as part of 
the apiman 1.2.x line of development.  Perhaps as early as 1.2.1.Final.

-Eric

On 12/31/2015 1:00 AM, Guy Davis wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Thanks for the quick response.  I tried this using a separate Keycloak
> 1.7.0 server and am encountering errors that, after debugging thru the
> Keycloak OAuth flow, seem linked to the use of the earlier version of
> the Keycloak adapter which is bundled with APIMan 1.1.9.  Do you have an
> planned release date for a Keycloak 1.7.0 compatible version of APIMan?
> Continued successful integration between these two projects is a big
> benefit.
>
> If try to use APIMan 1.1.9 with the Keycloak 1.7.0 adapter for Wildfly,
> I encounter a problem in
> io.apiman.manager.ui.server.wildfly8,KeyCloakBearerTokenGenerator where
> the use of:
>
>      org.keycloak.util.Time,getTime()
>
> errors out at runtime with ClassNotFoundException as this class was
> dropped from the Keycloak 1.7.0 API.
>
> Thanks again.
> Guy
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Eric Wittmann <eric.wittmann at redhat.com
> <mailto:eric.wittmann at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     This is absolutely possible.  Have a look through the production
>     guide and see if it helps:
>
>     http://www.apiman.io/latest/production-guide.html
>
>     If you continue to have issues let us know so that we can update the
>     guide.  We already have at least one update to make:
>
>     https://issues.jboss.org/browse/APIMAN-842
>
>     -Eric
>
>     On 12/17/2015 3:48 PM, Guy Davis wrote:
>
>         Good day,
>
>         I currently have a test instance of Wildfly 9 running both
>         Keycloak 1.5
>         and Apiman 1.1.8.  I'm using Keycloak 1.5 as Apiman makes a Keycloak
>         getTime() call somewhere that was removed in Keycloak 1.6's
>         adapters.
>
>         So I'm seeing that trying to put Keycloak and Apiman in the same
>         Wildfly
>         container is probably not a good plan going forward due to
>         incompatibilities as each project progresses.
>
>         Today, I noticed that Hawkular announced
>         <http://www.hawkular.org/blog/2015/12/16/hawkular-1.0.0.Alpha8-released.html>
>         that they now allow startup of their container with a property
>         pointing
>         to a remote Keycloak server.
>
>         Is this possible with Apiman today?  If not, is it on the
>         roadmap?  I'd
>         like to upgrade to Keycloak 1.7
>         <http://blog.keycloak.org/2015/12/keycloak-170final-released.html>
>         following
>         this approach with Keycloak, Apiman, and Hawkular all in their own
>         containers.
>
>         By the way, I'm really stoked to see the excellent integration and
>         progress being made by all these projects!  Keep up the good work.
>
>         Thanks,
>         Guy
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Apiman-user mailing list
>         Apiman-user at lists.jboss.org <mailto:Apiman-user at lists.jboss.org>
>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/apiman-user
>
>


More information about the Apiman-user mailing list