[Apiman-user] Impact of adding extra fields in Rate Limiting Policy

Ram.Tanna at ril.com Ram.Tanna at ril.com
Fri Jan 13 07:54:38 EST 2017


Dear Team,

I have added 2 extra fields in Rate limiting Policy, as shown in the below image.

These extra fields are added because I need it in response header in success(200) as well as failure(429) responses.

To do so I have modified below mentioned files,

1.       rate-limiting.include



<div>

  <span>I want to set retry time to</span>

    <input id="time-limit" ng-model="config.retryTime" class="form-control inline-apiman-form-control form-control" style="width: 100px" type="text" apiman-i18n-key="rate-limiting.enter-num-requests" placeholder="Time limit" ng-disabled="isEntityDisabled()"></input>



    <select id="retryTimeUnit" ng-model="config.retryTimeUnit"  apiman-select-picker="" data-field="retryTimeUnit" class="selectpicker inline-line apiman-inline-form-dropdown" data-style="btn-default apiman-inline-form-dropdown" style="width: 100px" ng-disabled="isEntityDisabled()">

      <option value="Second" data-content="<span class='apiman-label-faded'>Second</span>" apiman-i18n-key="rate-limiting.second">Second</option>

      <option value="Minute" apiman-i18n-key="rate-limiting.minute">Minute</option>

      <option value="Hour" apiman-i18n-key="rate-limiting.hour">Hour</option>

      <option value="Day" apiman-i18n-key="rate-limiting.day">Day</option>

      <option value="Month" apiman-i18n-key="rate-limiting.month">Month</option>

      <option value="Year" apiman-i18n-key="rate-limiting.year">Year</option>

    </select>

                </div>


2.       RateLimitingConfig

private long retryTime;

               private RateLimitingPeriod retryTimeUnit;

-- getter , setters



3.       RateLimitingPolicy

responseHeaders.put("X-Retry-Time", timeLimit);





Kindly Confirm,

-          Where are we storing these information ? In Elastic Search, in SQL  or somewhere else ?

-          Will these changes make any impact on other components ?

-          Would you recommend this code change ?


Kindly suggest if you have any other solution for similar requirement.







[cid:image001.png at 01D26DC5.2691F410]
Regards,
Ram Tanna
9819002243
"Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the intended recipient(s). 
are confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient. you are hereby notified that any 
review. re-transmission. conversion to hard copy. copying. circulation or other use of this message and any attachments is 
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient. please notify the sender immediately by return email. 
and delete this message and any attachments from your system.

Virus Warning: Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email. 
The company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachment."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/apiman-user/attachments/20170113/2bf32bea/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 62442 bytes
Desc: image001.png
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/apiman-user/attachments/20170113/2bf32bea/attachment-0001.png 


More information about the Apiman-user mailing list