[arquillian-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ARQRUSH-26) Support detection of changes in cases and tests (removals, additions, modifications)
Lukáš Fryč (JIRA)
jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Jul 19 03:31:07 EDT 2012
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQRUSH-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Lukáš Fryč reassigned ARQRUSH-26:
---------------------------------
Assignee: Lukáš Fryč
> Support detection of changes in cases and tests (removals, additions, modifications)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ARQRUSH-26
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQRUSH-26
> Project: Arquillian RushEye
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Core, Manager
> Reporter: Lukáš Fryč
> Assignee: Lukáš Fryč
>
> {quote}
> T 1341996997 31<lfryc>30 (5) problem of changes in test suite
> T 1341997028 31<lfryc>30 basically what to do when "screenshots1" and "screenshots2" differs
> T 1341997042 31<lfryc>30 in case of:
> T 1341997047 31<lfryc>30 a) test additions
> T 1341997050 31<lfryc>30 b) test removals
> T 1341997055 31<lfryc>30 c) test modifications
> T 1341997087 31<lfryc>30 the Manager should inteligently show the test case with matching images
> T 1341997100 31<lfryc>30 and even allow context-menu resolution
> T 1341997163 31<lfryc>30 we are currently investigating what's the stability of test suite (if the list of images doesn't differ between runs)
> T 1341997163 18<fafnir88> if there is no corresponding image for test, this big image warning will be shown
> T 1341997204 31<lfryc>30 yeah, this would need to be more smart..
> T 1341997220 31<lfryc>30 let's see this case, you get those tests (images):
> T 1341997248 31<lfryc>30 00-open
> T 1341997248 31<lfryc>30 01-click
> T 1341997248 31<lfryc>30 02-click
> T 1341997248 31<lfryc>30 03-type
> T 1341997248 31<lfryc>30 04-click
> T 1341997248 31<lfryc>30 05-click
> T 1341997274 31<lfryc>30 but then you get other just those:
> T 1341997279 31<lfryc>30 00-open
> T 1341997283 31<lfryc>30 01-click
> T 1341997285 31<lfryc>30 03-type
> T 1341997304 31<lfryc>30 those images identifies all changes during the automated browser test
> T 1341997316 31<lfryc>30 then you have problem
> T 1341997321 31<lfryc>30 (sorry 02-type)
> T 1341997337 31<lfryc>30 the Manager could fallback to heuristics
> T 1341997359 31<lfryc>30 and in case of the images does not match in suite and samples..
> T 1341997378 18<fafnir88> so, you want to have a test pruning for missing cases?
> T 1341997380 31<lfryc>30 it can offer alternative mode, when it could try determine what happened
> T 1341997390 18<fafnir88> *test tree
> T 1341997394 31<lfryc>30 yep
> T 1341997402 31<lfryc>30 it should show something like:
> T 1341997407 31<lfryc>30 OK 00-open
> T 1341997412 31<lfryc>30 OK 01-click
> T 1341997434 31<lfryc>30 02-click (missing sample)
> T 1341997445 31<lfryc>30 02-type (missing pattern)
> {quote}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
More information about the arquillian-issues
mailing list