[arquillian-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ARQ-286) Should support JUnit @Rules

[Stefan Miklosovic (JIRA)]

    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12978489#comment-12978489 ] 

Stefan Miklosovic edited comment on ARQ-286 at 6/23/14 5:54 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

It seems to me that it is still failing in RunAsClient scenario. Consider this:

{code}
@RunWith(Arquillian.class)
@RunAsClient
public class TestCase
{

    @Rule
    public ExpectedException e = ExpectedException.none();

    @Test
    public void test()
    {
        e.expect(RuntimeException.class)
        throw new RuntimeException();
    }
}
{code}

Observing org.jboss.arquillian.test.spi.event.suite.After and org.jboss.arquillian.test.spi.TestResult still tells me that result.getStatus() == Status.FAILED is true.

I am using 

{code}
        <dependency>
            <groupId>org.jboss.arquillian.junit</groupId>
            <artifactId>arquillian-junit-container</artifactId>
            <scope>test</scope>
        </dependency>
{code}

in the test project.

Should I file related jira or client mode was not treated yet?

Thanks


was (Author: smikloso):
It seems to me that it is still failing in RunAsClient scenario. Consider this:

{code}
@RunWith(Arquillian.class)
@RunAsClient
public class TestCase
{

    @Rule
    public ExpectedException e = ExpectedException.none();

    @Test
    public void test()
    {
        e.expect(RuntimeException.class)
        throw new RuntimeException();
    }
}
{code}

Observing org.jboss.arquillian.test.spi.event.suite.After and org.jboss.arquillian.test.spi.event.suite.After still tells me that result.getStatus() == Status.FAILED is true.

Should I file related jira or client mode was not treated yet?

Thanks

> Should support JUnit @Rules
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARQ-286
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-286
>             Project: Arquillian
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: Test Harness Integration
>            Reporter: Aslak Knutsen
>            Assignee: Aslak Knutsen
>             Fix For: 1.1.5.Final
>
>
> Using the JUnit feature @Rule becomes a problem when running against Remote servers since the @Rule is executed both on the Client and Container side. 
> It works fine in Embedded Containers since the Test is executed in the same VM, but if the Rule is dependent on Container features, the @Test will fail.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)