[bv-dev] Ordered Validation (practically)

Matt Benson mbenson at apache.org
Thu Jan 5 10:58:52 EST 2012


On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> On 5 janv. 2012, at 13:44, Hardy Ferentschik wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Thanks for summing up.
>>
>> No problem. I will try to sum this up on beanvalidation.org asap as well.
>
> Thanks, say you sum up BV-220 and BV-259 and I will sum up the other subjects disccussed in the last few days. Lots of good content :)

Guys,
  Just to inject a little insanity into the debate... we've touched on
the idea of obtaining information in unorthodox ways before (parameter
names come to mind).  Now, this proceeds from the assumption that a
given Java compiler would assemble bytecode such that visible
annotations would stay in the order in which they were defined, but
given that that is true for one or more available compilers, what is
the feeling of the community toward specifying that order be derived
from bytecode inspection?  I realize this is quite specific, but in
the end nothing is more intuitive than just using the annotations in
the order in which they are actually specified.

Matt

> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev


More information about the beanvalidation-dev mailing list