[bv-dev] [BVAL-226] Consider runtime type when building property path

[Gerhard Petracek]

+1

regards,
gerhard



2012/5/31 Hardy Ferentschik <hardy at hibernate.org>

> +1 as well, especially since Hibernate Validator also implements this
> approach since HV-468 ;-)
>
> On May 30, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>
> > For your info, the change is quite minimal
> >
> https://github.com/emmanuelbernard/beanvalidation-spec/commit/f85703a2a395b0cb95148c9eabc6b4a439df717c
> >
> > On 30 mai 2012, at 20:11, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> >
> >> It seems there is some kind of consensus that considering the runtime
> type instead of the satin type to build the property path is better.
> >> Check out https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVAL-226 and let me know
> if you object.
> >>
> >> Otherwise, I plan to clarify this in the spec.
> >>
> >> Emmanuel
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> >> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> > beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20120602/953f3235/attachment.html