[bv-dev] Bean Validation 1.1 early draft 1 is out

[Gerhard Petracek]

hi gunnar,

since it isn't a complicated topic, we can write a proposal as soon as we
have a basic agreement about the approach.

imo it's pretty easy - it's just about:

 - an interface which directly allows simple but still flexible custom
implementations of (custom) message-sources (including a simple delegation
to a ResourceBundle).
vs.
 - an interface which is restricted to ResourceBundle. -> if it isn't
possible to use ListResourceBundle or PropertyResourceBundle, users have to
implement #getKeys which might not be possible (/ that easy) for some
advanced use-cases.

the rest is more or less the same - if the MessageInterpolator receives a
key, it uses the new interface for the lookup (if there is no custom
implementation of the new interface or no result for the given key, the
existing default bundle (ValidationMessages) is used as a fallback).

regards,
gerhard



2012/6/26 Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org>

> Hi Gerhard,
>
> I thin I've not yet totally understood what you have in mind.
> Maybe you could create a proposal for BVAL-217 describing things more in
> detail (interaction between resolver and interpolator, integration with BV
> 1.0 interpolators etc.)?
> I also think using resource bundles is not totally optional as there is
> the ValidationMessages bundle.
>
> --Gunnar
> Am 25.06.2012 18:49 schrieb "Gerhard Petracek" <gerhard.petracek at gmail.com
> >:
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20120630/544aa7e9/attachment.html