[bv-dev] Method validation: cross-parameter constraints

[Gerhard Petracek]

+1 for #3

regards,
gerhard



2012/2/28 Michael Nascimento <misterm at gmail.com>

> 3 seems by far the best since it can be strongly typed-checked through
> a processor, as mentioned.
>
> Regards,
> Michael
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
> <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 26 févr. 2012, at 12:21, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> >
> >> @Emmanuel: For the first BV 1.1 draft I suggest to leave out
> >> cross-parameter constraints. This shouldn't change the general scheme
> >> of method validation, so we could add that in a later draft revision.
> >
> > That or you describe succinctly options 2 and 3 for feedback.
> > _______________________________________________
> > beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> > beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20120301/1f45af1c/attachment.html