[bv-dev] Method validation - cont'd

[Matt Benson]

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Emmanuel Bernard
<emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
>
> On 14 mai 2012, at 18:21, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Interesting point, the more so because I was about to suggest a
>>> proxy-based variation of cross-parameter validation approach #3.
>>> Maybe interface-only per spec, with subclassing as an optional
>>> extension.  Thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> Actually, ruminating further on this... the approach I was thinking of
>> would require at least a partial implementation of a given class, just
>> to handle validation (any method result being discarded).  The
>> subclassing capability would be necessary regardless of whether only
>> interfaces were supported, so final methods would be the only thing
>> off-limits.
>
> You have lost me :) Can you detail further what you are proposing, maybe with some examples.

Okay, I have tried to organize my thoughts to some degree at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BVAL/inheritance-based+cross-parameter+method+validation
.

Matt

> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev