[bv-dev] [BVAL-226] Consider runtime type when building property path

[Michael Nascimento]

+1 for runtime type.

Regards,
Michael

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org> wrote:
> +1 for using the runtime type.
>
> --Gunnar
>
>
> 2012/5/30 Sebastian Thomschke <sebastian.thomschke at web.de>:
>>  I am +1 for runtime type consideration.
>>
>> Seb
>>
>> On 30.05.2012 20:50, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>> For your info, the change is quite minimal
>>> https://github.com/emmanuelbernard/beanvalidation-spec/commit/f85703a2a395b0cb95148c9eabc6b4a439df717c
>>>
>>> On 30 mai 2012, at 20:11, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>>
>>>> It seems there is some kind of consensus that considering the runtime type instead of the satin type to build the property path is better.
>>>> Check out https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVAL-226 and let me know if you object.
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise, I plan to clarify this in the spec.
>>>>
>>>> Emmanuel
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>>>> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>>> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev