[bv-dev] Should getters be considered methods during validation

[Emmanuel Bernard]

Any other input? Gunnar and Hardy you had some thoughts on the subject
afair :)

Emmanuel

On Tue 2012-10-23 12:37, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Emmanuel Bernard
> <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
> > For method validation, we have so far managed to get away with
> > requiring an annotation based metadata to direct how method validation
> > behaves.
> >
> > One question that popped up during the recent write up is whether or not
> > getters should be considered regular methods and thus be intercepted and
> > validation by CDI or AspectJ interceptors.
> >
> > I have my own ideas, but I'd like to get your opinion on the subject.
> 
> Hi, Emmanuel!  Great/horrible question.  :)
> 
> My inclination, for the purposes of the specification, is "a method is
> a method" but I'd hope to see implementation-specific mechanisms to
> globally disable method validation on getters.
> 
> $0.02,
> Matt
> 
> >
> > Emmanuel
> > _______________________________________________
> > beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> > beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev