[bv-dev] BV 2.0 - Add constraints?

[Gunnar Morling]

Hi,

I like the idea of collecting some more feedback from the community.

A blog post may be an option, though I reckon feedback will be sparse based
on previous experiences. I'd rather do a survey as it's more actionable for
people. Either on Twitter (though that seems a bit limited) or using Google
Forms [1], which is my preference.

I'll prepare something and share it with you soon. If the survey looks
good, we can promote it on Twitter and during the Hackergarten at J1 (of
course talking to people in person there will be a great chance to learn
about their wishes, too).

It'd be nice if we got some insight from that.

Cheers,

--Gunnar

[1] https://docs.google.com/forms/


2016-09-09 11:34 GMT+02:00 Marco Molteni <moltenma at gmail.com>:

> Hi all,
>
> which is the best / common way to get a representative feedback according
> to your experience?
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Christian Kaltepoth <
> christian at kaltepoth.de> wrote:
>
>> I also think that adding the most popular 3rd party constraints directly
>> to the spec is a good thing. Especially @NotBlank and @NotEmpty.
>>
>> However, I also agree that it would be nice to gather more feedback from
>> the community to learn which constraints people would like to see in the
>> spec.
>>
>> 2016-09-06 20:50 GMT+02:00 Michael Nascimento <misterm at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> +1 to including them.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Marco Molteni <moltenma at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > It would be possible to add some built-in constraints to the V 2.0?
>>> >
>>> > @NotBlank, @NotEmpty, @Length are used very often in projects, they are
>>> > already present in Hibernate Validator and their implementation is well
>>> > defined.
>>> >
>>> > What do you think?
>>> >
>>> > Here a list of the most used constraint for GitHub's projects (the
>>> numbers
>>> > change at every request but you get the idea. HV = Hibernate
>>> Validator, BV =
>>> > Bean Validation):
>>> >
>>> > 189'143 - BV - NotNull
>>> >  56'902 - BV - Size
>>> >  39'551 - HV - NotEmpty <-
>>> >  20'687 - HV - NotBlank <-
>>> >  17'735 - BV - Pattern
>>> >  16'763 - HV - Email
>>> >  16'033 - BV - Min
>>> >  12'769 - HV - Length <-
>>> >   7'806 - BV - Digits
>>> >   4'982 - BV - Max
>>> >   4'971 - BV - Past
>>> >   3'598 - BV - DecimalMin
>>> >   2'753 - BV - AssertTrue
>>> >   2'379 - BV - DecimalMax
>>> >   2'308 - BV - Future
>>> >   1'999 - HV - Range
>>> >   1'497 - HV - URL
>>> > < 1'000 other constraints
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> >
>>> > Cheers
>>> >
>>> > Marco
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>>> > beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>>> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Kaltepoth
>> Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>> GitHub: https://github.com/chkal
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20160914/9af02ca9/attachment.html