[bv-dev] Happy Holidays and State of the Union

Emmanuel Bernard emmanuel at hibernate.org
Tue Jan 3 11:23:40 EST 2017


It captures nicely Bean Validation. I like it :)

On Mon 17-01-02 23:13, Hendrik Ebbers wrote:
>Hi all & a happy new year!
>
>I received a first sketch for the JSR logo (final version will be vector based). What do you think?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Hendrik
>
>
>
>
>> Am 31.12.2016 um 17:35 schrieb Christian Kaltepoth <christian at kaltepoth.de>:
>>
>> Hey Gunnar,
>>
>> thank you very much for these kind words. I would also like to thank you and everyone else in the EG for the great work. Keep up the good work everyone! :-)
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> 2016-12-23 11:28 GMT+01:00 Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org <mailto:gunnar at hibernate.org>>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As the year's end is approaching, I'd like to wish everyone Happy
>> Holidays and a great year 2017! I hope you can relax a bit during the
>> holidays and have a great time with your loved ones.
>>
>> Also let me say a big "thank you" for all your contributions to Bean
>> Validation 2.0; all the proposals, discussions, reviews etc. have been
>> very valuable and are appreciated very much. I think we've made some
>> good progress already, with some easy wins already merged and more
>> complex matters such as type-level constraints having advanced quite a
>> bit.
>>
>> While waiting for some more feedback on the latest revision of the
>> extractor proposal [1], I'm finally getting back to the proposal for
>> java.time support. The API change has already been merged, the RI will
>> follow closely and you can expect a pull request for the spec update
>> very soon.
>>
>> With these two things (value extractors, java.time support) in place
>> at least in some preliminary form, I think we are in good shape for a
>> first preview release of the spec. Is there anything missing that you
>> think should absolutely be in the first preview? My goal is to do the
>> release early in January. I hope we can get some feedback from the
>> wider community based on this.
>>
>> Subsequently, we should pick up some other loose ends such as the
>> validateValues() idea (BVAL-214) and other things like constraint
>> ordering (BVAL-248), separation of message interpolation and message
>> bundle retrieval (BVAL-217) and more.
>>
>> All, thanks again for your efforts with this spec. I'm looking forward
>> to making BV 2.0 happen together with you in 2017!
>>
>> --Gunnar
>>
>> [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/2016-December/001140.html <http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/2016-December/001140.html>
>> _______________________________________________
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Kaltepoth
>> Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ <http://blog.kaltepoth.de/>
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal <http://twitter.com/chkal>
>> GitHub: https://github.com/chkal <https://github.com/chkal>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>

>_______________________________________________
>beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev



More information about the beanvalidation-dev mailing list