[bv-dev] BV 2.0 - Add constraints?
moltenma at gmail.com
Fri Mar 24 14:20:54 EDT 2017
1. Constraint composition: I agree with Guillaume, I thinks is better let
the providers do their own implementation.
2. Email regex: Good for me.
3. @Positive/@Negative: Ok.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet at gmail.com>
> Hi Gunnar,
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org>
>> * Should @NotEmpty mandate the usage of constraint composition (as
>> it's done in the PRs)? It essentially prescribes an "implementation",
>> i.e. providers wouldn't even need a constraint validator for it. But
>> then this excludes any more efficient implementation a provider may
>> have (well, they could by special-handling this constraint).
> I'm not convinced it's such a good idea to use constraint composition for
> @NotBlank and @NotEmpty. I would let the implementation to the providers,
> especially since using constraint composition does not really buy us
> anything in this case.
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the beanvalidation-dev