[bv-dev] ValueExtractionUnwrappingTest: quibble between spec and TCK

Guillaume Smet guillaume.smet at gmail.com
Fri Mar 30 08:46:02 EDT 2018

Hi Matt,

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 1:01 AM, Matt Benson <mbenson at apache.org> wrote:

> The distinction is perhaps subtle, and I agree that the behavior
> itself is reasonable; it just doesn't precisely agree with the current
> wording, and I felt I should raise it as an issue.

I remember us having discussions about this and I think the TCK tests are
the outcome of this discussion.

It looks like we haven't updated the spec though.

Not sure what to do about this one. The TCK tests make more sense than the
spec and IIRC that's what we decided to do.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20180330/5d9f2df9/attachment.html 

More information about the beanvalidation-dev mailing list