[bv-dev] ValueExtractionUnwrappingTest: quibble between spec and TCK

Guillaume Smet guillaume.smet at gmail.com
Fri Mar 30 10:06:33 EDT 2018

On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Matt Benson <mbenson at apache.org> wrote:

> Can we just make the change in the source of the spec so that it will have
> been handled should we do a 2.1 version? Failing that, could this
> particular test be somehow marked as optional for an implementation to
> pass? I've made the changes to permit it in the Apache implementation in
> any case.

Changing the spec for 2.1 would be my preference.

Let's wait for Gunnar insights. He's the master of the spec.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20180330/726a589c/attachment.html 

More information about the beanvalidation-dev mailing list