<html><head/><body><html><head></head><body><div class="gmail_quote">Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel@hibernate.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: monospace; margin-top: 0px">I was pretty sure I sent such an email a while back but I can't find it.<br /><br />I would like to move our spec to the latest and more opened JCP rules aka 2.9. I am almost certain that we do comply with it and that we even go further than what is expected of us. For your info rules 2.8 force things like publicly visible and archived communication. We currently are under the JCP 2.7 rules.<br /><br />Here is a list of changes <a href="http://jcp.org/en/resources/2.8">http://jcp.org/en/resources/2.8</a><br />Here is how to migrate <a href="http://jcp.org/en/resources/change_jcp_version">http://jcp.org/en/resources/change_jcp_version</a><br /><br />Please speak up if you don't want the spec to move to the new rules. Otherwise I will proceed next week after turkeys have been thoroughly digested by our USA reps :)<br /><br />Emmanuel<br /><hr /><br />beanvalidation-dev mailing list<br />beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org<br /><a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br clear="all">I am here at DOAG with Patrick Curran and he says that going to 2.8 is something we should do right away. 2.8 and 2.9 are essentially the same.<br>
<br>
Ed</body></html></body></html>