<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">+1 for naming consistency<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<br>
Seb<br>
<br>
On 04.01.2013 11:05, Gunnar Morling wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CADGJaX-c_WpPHgBOnh_N8rDg3M8sgBMjPGuOWWyAJp4QipDcMQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi all,
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="">While working on the TCK, I came across our new
method Validator#forMethods() which allows to validate method
and constructor parameters/return values.</div>
<div style=""><br>
</div>
<div style="">Given that we introduced the term "executable"
when referring to both methods and constructors, I wondered
whether the method should better be named "forExecutables()".</div>
<div style=""><br>
</div>
<div style="">Thoughts?</div>
<div style=""><br>
</div>
<div style="">--Gunnar</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org">beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>