<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><span style="color: rgb(42, 46, 46); font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;" class="">I like the the proposal :)</span><br style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(42, 46, 46); font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;" class=""><span style="color: rgb(42, 46, 46); font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px;" class="">Currently it do not support new data types like Period or Duration (implementations of TemporalAmount). But for this types new annotations / constraints are needed. The question is if this should be supported by the JSR, too.</span><div class=""><font color="#2a2e2e" face="Helvetica Neue, arial, sans-serif" class=""><span style="font-size: 15px;" class=""><br class=""></span></font><div style=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Am 30.08.2016 um 14:39 schrieb Gunnar Morling <<a href="mailto:gunnar@hibernate.org" class="">gunnar@hibernate.org</a>>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">Anyone with thoughts/input on supporting the JSR 310 types?</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">2016-08-25 12:10 GMT+02:00 Gunnar Morling <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:gunnar@hibernate.org" target="_blank" class="">gunnar@hibernate.org</a>></span>:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" class="">Hi,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I've pushed another proposal to the website [1], it's about adding @Past/@Future support for the date/time types added in Java 8 (java.time.* package, added by JSR 310). The proposal essentially standardizes the proprietary support we had in HV, plus some additions.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Please let me know what you think, especially on the questions towards the end. Either put comments inline on the source on GitHub [2] or let's have a discussion here.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I haven't been using JSR 310 extensively myself, so any feedback by those who have is more than welcome.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">--Gunnar</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">[1] <a href="http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-496/" target="_blank" class="">http://beanvalidation.org/<wbr class="">proposals/BVAL-496/</a></div><div class="">[2] <a href="https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation.org/blob/production/proposals/BVAL-496.adoc" target="_blank" class="">https://github.com/<wbr class="">beanvalidation/beanvalidation.<wbr class="">org/blob/production/proposals/<wbr class="">BVAL-496.adoc</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br class=""></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">beanvalidation-dev mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org" class="">beanvalidation-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br class="">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>