<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 5:55 AM, Gunnar Morling <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gunnar@hibernate.org" target="_blank">gunnar@hibernate.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">2017-05-24 18:01 GMT+02:00 Michael Nascimento <<a href="mailto:misterm@gmail.com">misterm@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
</span><span class="">> The non-negative names are the way to go if we go the separate annotations<br>
> route.<br>
<br>
</span>Can you elaborate on your reasoning?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>OUCH, I meant the non-non-negative aka PositiveOrZero / NegativeOrZero. Sorry for that. It just shows how confusing negative names are :-)</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">
> I'm not a big fan of simply listening to the masses though and I'm<br>
> wondering whether these annotations pull their weight, though. I feel more<br>
> inclined towards orZero, which is the second most popular choice.<br>
<br>
</span>Ok, but I think it'd be bad form to first ask for feedback and then<br>
not follow the expressed preference. </blockquote><div><br></div><div>I respect your reasoning. However, the difference is not statistically significant and we are going for the second option, which shows we're listening to a degree.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Also I think this is mostly a question of style, it's not a black and white thing. </blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's for sure.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Michael</div></div></div></div>