[cdi-dev] Moving to JSR-348
fabmars at gmail.com
Wed Dec 7 16:10:18 EST 2011
+1 for both points.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> Yes, but the PMO told me I needed a unanimous vote I think ;-)
> Sorry for the extra work!
> On 7 Dec 2011, at 15:16, Mark Struberg wrote:
> > +1
> > (we already voted on this, didn't we?)
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
> >> To: Joseph Bergmark <bergmark at us.ibm.com>; norman.erck at holisticon.de;
> mathieu.ancelin at gmail.com; George Gastaldi <gegastaldi at gmail.com>;
> Richard Hightower <richardhightower at gmail.com>; Werner Keil <
> werner.keil at gmx.net>; Jérôme Petit <jerome.petit at serli.com>; Antoine
> Sabot-Durand <antoine at sabot-durand.net>; Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de>;
> Sivakumar Thyagarajan <sivakumar.thyagarajan at oracle.com>
> >> Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 11:18 AM
> >> Subject: Moving to JSR-348
> >> Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine,
> Mark, Siva,
> >> We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348.
> >> The JCP PMO have raised two points:
> >> 1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page
> >> http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move.
> >> 2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members.
> >> not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you
> >> remove that private alias.
> >> Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at
> >> https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to
> subscribe to
> >> cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway.
> >> Pete
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cdi-dev