[cdi-dev] CDI-88

[Peter Muir]

Doh!

Should be fixed in the pull now :-(

--
Pete Muir
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete

On 20 Jun 2011, at 18:05, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi at gmail.com> wrote:

> Pete,
> 
> There is a typo on your method name.
> 
> In your pull request it´s "getAnnoatedEventParameter", I believe it
> should read "getAnnotatedEventParameter" (there is a "t" missing)
> 
> 2011/6/20 Pete Muir <pmuir at bleepbleep.org.uk>:
>> All
>> 
>> The 1.0 release contained a bug in the API of CDI (Javadoc and sig tests) - namely we got the ProcessObserverMethod interface totally wrong. It was had a method that was not in the spec, was missing a method and it's generic parameters were wrong.
>> 
>> On talking to the Oracle compatibility team, it looks like we can fix this error in CDI 1.1 but I am still concerned that this may break user apps and extensions too much. Thoughts?
>> 
>> The changes to fix this are at https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/30
>> 
>> Pete
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev