[cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 EDR1 posted :-)
richardhightower at gmail.com
Thu Oct 6 18:03:24 EDT 2011
I feel we need it too. I guess this goes without saying though.
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> I've received a lot of feedback at JavaOne that XML config is something
> people want to see in the standard. So I would like to revisit this
> Feel free to discuss now, or I'll start with a proposal in a few weeks :-)
> On 5 Oct 2011, at 23:43, Mark Struberg wrote:
> > Fine thing.
> > Although I see a few issues which I'd rather like to keep off core CDI as
> they are very easy to implement as portable Extensions (e.g. the XML config
> stuff CDI-123).
> > We really must take care that we don't add things which bloats the CDI
> core spec with 20 pages which are hard to get right.
> > Instead we should really focus on things which are fundamental basics and
> thus cannot be done via a portable Extension.
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
> >> To: cdi-dev <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> >> Cc:
> >> Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2011 2:21 AM
> >> Subject: [cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 EDR1 posted :-)
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cdi-dev mailing list
> >> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cdi-dev