[cdi-dev] CDI 1.1 EDR1 posted :-)
richardhightower at gmail.com
Thu Oct 13 20:24:32 EDT 2011
Basically if CDI does these....
•Split specification into core and Java EE integration
•Java SE context definition
1, 1.1, and 1.2 need to be rewritten.
The spec CDI 1.0 started out very JSF and EJB centric. CDI is, and is
becoming more so, more general.
Then all of the intro material from
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Peter Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
> I would be more than happy to accept rewrites here.
> I think the best way is for you to offer a proposal and then we discuss it
> Pete Muir
> On 13 Oct 2011, at 19:16, Rick Hightower <richardhightower at gmail.com>
> I think CDI has changed its purpose and scope enough that some of the intro
> material which made total sense when CDI was forming is now missing the
> CDI sort of evolved what was possible. The intro is still talking about the
> CDI you are going to build and the problem it is trying to solve.
> CDI 1.1, problem has been solved well, and CDI redefined what was there.
> Anyway... the intro material does not match the current scope and where CDI
> is today.
> I think its important because some folks will never get past the intro...
> Don't want CDI to be pigeon holed into some role it has but it is so much
> more than that.
> It is more general purpose than that.
> I want to table this. I can offer some rewrites.. But wanted to throw this
> out there.
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Pete Muir < <pmuir at redhat.com>
> pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> *Rick Hightower*
> (415) 968-9037
> Profile <http://www.google.com/profiles/RichardHightower>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cdi-dev