[cdi-dev] Minutes from EG meeting 20/08/2012
pmuir at redhat.com
Tue Aug 21 10:50:43 EDT 2012
I've looked at the spec, and bean's which aren't enabled shouldn't pass through ProcessBean, and other such container lifecycle events.
Jozef, can you check Weld for us, and see if this is actually implemented?
On 21 Aug 2012, at 14:45, Pete Muir wrote:
> Pete proposed dropping @Veto, and instead being able to declaratively and explicitly control whether a bean is enabled or disabled. Pete to write up full proposal.
More information about the cdi-dev