[cdi-dev] [JBoss JIRA] (CDI-234) behavior of arrays without @Nonbinding

Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA) jira-events at lists.jboss.org
Thu Aug 23 16:56:15 EDT 2012


    [ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713455#comment-12713455 ] 

Romain Manni-Bucau commented on CDI-234:
----------------------------------------

...or add a parameter in Nonbinding annotation to configure it

BTW personally i think it should be transitive (at least by default) otherwise it is a bit weird out of the box
                
> behavior of arrays without @Nonbinding
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CDI-234
>                 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-234
>             Project: CDI Specification Issues
>          Issue Type: Feature Request
>          Components: Concepts
>    Affects Versions: 1.0
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Assignee: Pete Muir
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.1.PRD
>
>
> The spec says:
> "Array-valued or annotation-valued members of a qualifier type should be annotated @Nonbinding in a portable application.
> If an array-valued or annotation-valued member of a qualifier type is not annotated @Nonbinding, non-portable behavior
> results."
> The case of arrays without this annotation should be managed to get a better portability. The equality of arrays is determined through "Arrays" helper (http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/api/java/lang/annotation/Annotation.html) so i don't think there is any technical issue to consider arrays as a field.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


More information about the cdi-dev mailing list