[cdi-dev] War with no WEB-INF/beans.xml
lightguard.jp at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 17:30:43 EST 2012
Wait, what's the point of WEB-INF/beans.xml then?
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 15:28, Mark Struberg <struberg at yahoo.de> wrote:
> yes, that is exactly what should happen.
> Please note that you could also have a WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/beans.xml
> to pickup WEB-INF/classes as bean archive.
> I always do it that way, because Eclipse and Idea can handle this much
> better when you e.g. need to debug a webapp with mvn jetty:run
> > From: Joseph Snyder <j.j.snyder at oracle.com>
> >To: cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >Sent: Friday, February 3, 2012 9:34 PM
> >Subject: [cdi-dev] War with no WEB-INF/beans.xml
> >I have a test war that does not contain WEB-INF/beans.xml. However,
> there is a jar in WEB-INF/lib that does contain META-INF/beans.xml.
> According to the spec, 12.1, this war contains 1 bean archive, the one in
> the jar. (If there were a WEB-INF/beans.xml then there would be 2 bean
> archives in the war.) So when the war is deployed only the classes in the
> jar are managed by the CDI container. Therefore, if there is an injection
> point defined in a servlet (in WEB-INF/classes) then that injection point
> will never be processed by the CDI container. Is my interpretation of the
> spec correct?
> >cdi-dev mailing list
> >cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
Open Source Advocate
Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the cdi-dev