[cdi-dev] PFD submission

[Mark Struberg]

Beans without any explicit scope still get picked up as @Dependent. 
I thought this was agreed to get dropped if beans.xml version=1.1 ?

There are quite a few other wording and formatting changes which got added by bulk and make it hard to check for the differences since the last time I checked (and the EG didn't meet  since 2 months ago).

LieGrue,
strub





>________________________________
> From: Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
>To: "cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org" <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org> 
>Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 8:44 PM
>Subject: [cdi-dev] PFD submission
> 
>All,
>
>We need to submit the PFD on Wednesday next week.
>
>Please review the attached copy of the spec, it contains the current spec, with the proposed changes I sent out earlier, along with excludes in XML.
>
>There isn't much more to add now, just a few bits of tidying up, which I'lll aim to do on Monday.
>
>
>Please get any issues to me asap.
>
>Pete
>_______________________________________________
>cdi-dev mailing list
>cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20130222/6e31d294/attachment.html